After studying the results of MA with mor no 1977 k/Pid.Sus/2011, clear Kudubun, there were several records that were later considered legally flawed. “The Supreme Court's decision is incomplete, because of the page 18 there isn't any," he said while showing a copy of the Supreme Court's decision on the illegal logging case with the defendant John Robert Andreas. According to Laurens Kudubun, page 18 which contains the considerations used by the Supreme Court to decide the case is considered very important. No pages 18, His party considers the Supreme Court's decision to be unenforceable. “We will go to the Supreme Court to correct this decision.
We will also ask the MA to withdraw a copy of this decision,he explained. Because the copy of the Supreme Court's decision is incomplete and considered defective, Laurens asked the District Attorney's Office (Prosecutor) Banyuwangi stopped the erroneous execution attempt. “Our client execution, John Robert Andreas, cannot be implemented,” this tus nya. Apart from an incomplete copy of the decision, The Supreme Court's decision also does not state that the defendant must be immediately detained or released. Call him, it is contrary to Article 197 (1) letter k KUHAP. “The decision cannot be implemented,He said. (radar)