BANYUWANGI – Approaching the jury's verdict, the trial of the murder case of the Rosan family with the accused Muhamad Ali Hinduan alias Habib, 44, it's getting more and more exciting. Through duplicates, legal counsel (PH) the defendant named Siti Nur Hayati SH insisted that her client was not the mastermind behind the murder of Rosan and his wife and children.
In a follow-up hearing that was held in the main room of the District Court (PN) Banyuwangi with a duplicate reading agenda, The defendant's PH remains stance as in the defense note that was submitted at the previous trial "I will only respond to the elements in Article (chapter 340 jo Article 55 verse 1) applied is not sufficient,he said yesterday (12/11).
Defendant's attorney said, elements intentionally and by planning in advance, and the element of people who do, who ordered to do or participate in doing the act in this case is not fulfilled. "The prosecutor ruled out the testimony of witnesses Haidori Setiawan and Andi Azis," he said. In his testimony before the jury, he continued, Two witnesses who were also involved in the murder case withdrew their statements in the minutes of examination (BAP).
Especially, testimony in police investigations was not sworn in. “The statement in court was not sworn in, and two witnesses retracted their statements in the BAP,he explained. The defendant's PH also conveyed, Haidori and Andi Azis also revealed that it was Siwan who committed the murder and burned the three victims, who is now on the wanted list. (DPO). As previously reported, public prosecutor (JPU) Hari Utomo SH refused to be forgiven by the accused Muhamad Ali Hinduan alias Habib, 44.
In his reply, the prosecutor rejected the pleidoi (defense) submitted by the defendant's counsel. Prosecutor Hari Utomo said that the defense plea submitted by PH was only his own conclusion and did not look at the facts. Prosecutor said, revocation of the statement in the minutes of examination (BAP) from Haidori Setiawan and Andi Azis are considered invalid. So that, testimony as a witness is considered valid. “We still demand the death penalty," he asked. (radar)
